Wednesday, August 30, 2006

Hezbollywood?


Just when you thought Hezbollah couldn't sink any lower. (Quote from Mr Bagel.).

An Australian journalist made a really funny discovery. On a Hezbollah website that is used for major boasting about their successes, one of their picture is this one here, I borrowed it from them. It is supposed to depict a scene of Hezbollah fighters exploding an Israeli ship. Well, as per Andrew Bolt's discovery, Hezbollah also borrowed the photo -- from an Australian army site where the photo (posted 15-Nov-2005) shows the 1998 distruction of one of their decomissioned destroyer-escort, HMAS Torrens, off the coast of Western Australia. I wonder how many more of Hezbollah's photos are "borrowed material"...

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

Iran prepares its school children to fight the West(!?)

While researching analyses of school textbooks in the Middle East I found this interesting report on findings in the Iranian curriculum.

Palestinian refugees

From my earlier stance it must be obvious that in my mind the Middle East crisis, as a crisis, has been created (yes, I stand by my opinion) and fueled by the Arab countries of the area. Don't get me wrong, I do not say that those Arabs from British Palestine, who for one reason or another were forced to leave their properties behind and became refugees, were not wronged during the creation of Israel. What I cannot digest is the fact that they are still there in the refugee camps. Sixty years have past! Around the world there were horrendous hot spots, with horribly traumatised refugees who barely escaped with their lives, in numbers vastly greater than those of the Palestinians. Yet, they managed to move on, immigrated to different countries and rebuilt their lives.

To present you with my own personal perspective: I am a formal refugee from Eastern Europe, my family has lost everything one horrible night, down to the smallest personal items and, although we did not lose our lives like the Jews did, we accepted history's quirks and moved on. It would not have even occurred to us to stay in those Viennese refugee camps and orchestrate suicide bombings into our old countries. But then again nobody encouraged us to do so, nobody fed us fairy tales, nobody promised us that soon the lands behind the Iron Courtain will be reconquered and everybody will get back their lands and lost property. Because that is what the Palestinian refugees (if we can still call that the children and grandchildren of those who originally fled) are being promised, to this day, as they are kept isolated from the rest of the host countries, kept in poverty, while the rest of the Arab world enjoys the benefits of the wealth generated by the rising oil prices.

Recent political events, the fact that the majority of Palestinians voted for Hamas, an organization openly talking about the eventual distruction of Israel, have proven what I personally was aware of for a long time now, that Russian Communist propaganda egged on the majority of the Palestinians (as well as the rest of the Arab world) to keep on fighting towards Israel's total elimination (see my August 24 entry). This generation of refugees grew up using school books written in some cases as long ago as Nasser's regime in the fifties. What can you expect when children as young as 3-4 years old parrot words like: "Jews are apes and pigs". The girl in this clip is in Egypt, the interview was shown in Saudi Arabia, on Iqra TV on May 7, 2002.

My renewed efforts

For a while I felt that I was not informed enough to present ideas of my own on world events, in face of the very heated Middle Eastern confrontation, just to find later that they were not quite right. Instead I read feverishly and chose writings that I felt were closest to what I perceive as the true state of matters.

Today I decided to resume my own politicking because things are somewhat slower and so I do get a chance to formulate some (hopefully logical) conclusions. Not that my interests do not go beyond the Middle East, but events there were so much in the forefront of media focus that none of us got much chance to hear about goings-on in any other corner of the world. I will therefor start with my views on the present conditions there, to branch out later as I catch up with other issues that I will feel the urge to comment on. I also hope to have some time to add to my other blogs of general musings and the more ladylike home related postings (like recipes and stuff...).

If you happen to chance on these pages, please, drop me a few incouraging words so I will know my voice is not just a whisper in the wilderness. :)

Monday, August 28, 2006

The Undeclared World War III

An amazingly concise, clear and wise analysis of the current world situation, and the role of the Middle East.

Sunday, August 27, 2006

Attack on Israel was a mistake, Hezbollah leader says

Hmmm...? Says I...


The leader of the militant group Hezbollah says that if he had it to do all over again, he wouldn't order the capture of Israeli soldiers that ignited the war in Lebanon.
27/08/2006 CBC News

"You ask me, if I had known on July 11 ... that the operation would lead to such a war, would I do it? I say no, absolutely not," Sheik Hassan Nasrallah said in an interview with Lebanon's New TV station broadcast Sunday.

"He more or less admitted that he miscalculated," CBC Radio's Mike Hornbrook reported.

The war devastated Lebanon, where at least 850 militants and civilians died in Israeli bombardments and land attacks, while Hezbollah rockets and fighters killed at least 157 Israeli civilians and soldiers. Estimates of the cost of repairing damage to Lebanese buildings, roads and infrastructure run into the billions of dollars.

Hezbollah fighters crossed from Lebanon into northern Israel on July 12, killing three Israeli soldiers and capturing two more. Israel responded with attacks that lasted until a UN-organized ceasefire took effect on Aug. 14.

"We did not think, even one per cent, that the capture would lead to a war at this time and of this magnitude," Nasrallah said.

While Nasrallah claimed victory over Israel when the ceasefire took hold, he apologized in the interview for the suffering of the Lebanese people.

Thursday, August 24, 2006

What does Moscow have to do with the recent war in Lebanon?

Russian Footprints
What does Moscow have to do with the recent war in Lebanon?

National Review, August 24, 2006





By Ion Mihai Pacepa

The Kremlin may be the main winner in the Lebanon war. Israel has been attacked with soviet Kalashnikovs and Katyushas, Russian Fajr-1 and Fajr-3 rockets, Russian AT-5 Spandrel antitank missiles and Kornet antitank rockets. Russia’s outmoded weapons are now all the rage with terrorists everywhere in the world, and the bad guys know exactly where to get them. The weapons cases abandoned by Hezbollah were marked: “Customer: Ministry of Defense of Syria. Supplier: KBP, Tula, Russia.”

Today’s international terrorism was conceived at the Lubyanka, the headquarters of the KGB, in the aftermath of the1967 Six-Day War in the Middle East. I witnessed its birth in my other life, as a Communist general. Israel humiliated Egypt and Syria, whose bellicose governments were being run by Soviet razvedka (Russian for “foreign intelligence”) advisers, whereupon the Kremlin decided to arm Israel’s enemy neighbors, the Palestinians, and draw them into a terrorist war against Israel.

General Aleksandr Sakharovsky, who created Communist Romania’s intelligence structure and then rose to head up all of Soviet Russia’s foreign intelligence, often lectured me: “In today’s world, when nuclear arms have made military force obsolete, terrorism should become our main weapon.”

Between 1968 and 1978, when I broke with Communism, the security forces of Romania alone sent two cargo planes full of military goodies every week to Palestinian terrorists in Lebanon. Since the fall of Communism the East German Stasi archives have revealed that, in 1983 alone, its foreign intelligence service sent $1,877,600 worth of AK-47 ammunition to Lebanon. According to Vaclav Havel, Communist Czechoslovakia shipped 1,000 tons of the odorless explosive Semtex-H (which can’t be detected by sniffer dogs) to Islamic terrorists — enough for 150 years.

The terrorist war per se came into action at the end of 1968, when the KGB transformed airplane hijacking — that weapon of choice for September 11, 2001 — into an instrument of terror. In 1969 alone there were 82 hijackings of planes worldwide, carried out by the KGB-financed PLO. In 1971, when I was visiting Sakharovsky at his Lubyanka office, he called my attention to a sea of red flags pinned onto a world map hanging on the wall. Each flag represented a captured plane. “Airplane hijacking is my own invention,” he claimed.

The political “success” occasioned by hijacking Israeli airplanes prompted the KGB’s 13th Department, known in our intelligence jargon as the “Department for Wet Affairs” (wet being a euphemism for bloody), to expand into organizing “public executions” of Jews in airports, train stations, and other public places. In 1969 Dr. George Habash, a KGB puppet, explained: “Killing one Jew far away from the field of battle is more effective than killing a hundred Jews on the field of battle, because it attracts more attention.”

By the end of the 1960s, the KGB was deeply involved in mass terrorism against Jews, carried out by various Palestinian client organizations. Here are some terrorist actions for which the KGB took credit while I was still in Romania: November 1969, armed attack on the El Al office in Athens, leaving 1 dead and 14 wounded; May 30, 1972, Ben Gurion Airport attack, leaving 22 dead and 76 wounded; December 1974, Tel Aviv movie theater bomb, leaving 2 dead and 66 wounded; March 1975, attack on a Tel Aviv hotel, leaving 25 dead and 6 wounded; May 1975, Jerusalem bomb, leaving 1 dead and 3 wounded; July 4, 1975, bomb in Zion Square, Jerusalem, leaving 15 dead and 62 wounded; April 1978, Brussels airport attack, leaving 12 wounded; May 1978, attack on an El Al plane in Paris, leaving 12 wounded.

In 1971, the KGB launched operation Tayfun (Russian for “typhoon”), aimed at destabilizing Western Europe. The Baader-Meinhof, the Red Army Faction (RAF), and other KGB-sponsored Marxist organizations unleashed a wave of anti-American terrorism that shook Western Europe. Richard Welsh, the CIA station chief in Athens, was shot to death in Greece on December 23, 1975. General Alexander Haig, commander of NATO in Brussels was injured in a bomb attack that damaged his armored Mercedes beyond repair in June 1979. General Frederick J. Kroesen, commander of U.S. forces in Europe, barely survived a rocket attack in September 1981. Alfred Herrhausen, the pro-American chairman of Deutsche Bank, was killed during a grenade attack in November 1989. Hans Neusel, a pro-American state secretary in the West Germaninterior ministry, was wounded during an assassination attempt in July 1990.

In 1972, the Kremlin decided to turn the whole Islamic world against Israel and the U.S. As KGB chairman Yury Andropov told me, a billion adversaries could inflict far greater damage on America than could a few millions. We needed to instill a Nazi-style hatred for the Jews throughout the Islamic world, and to turn this weapon of the emotions into a terrorist bloodbath against Israel and its main supporter, the United States. No one within the American/Zionist sphere of influence should any longer feel safe.

According to Andropov, the Islamic world was a waiting petri dish in which we could nurture a virulent strain of America-hatred, grown from the bacterium of Marxist-Leninist thought. Islamic anti-Semitism ran deep. The Muslims had a taste for nationalism, jingoism, and victimology. Their illiterate, oppressed mobs could be whipped up to a fever pitch.

Terrorism and violence against Israel and her master, American Zionism, would flow naturally from the Muslims’ religious fervor, Andropov sermonized. We had only to keep repeating our themes — that the United States and Israel were “fascist, imperial-Zionist countries” bankrolled by rich Jews. Islam was obsessed with preventing the infidels’ occupation of its territory, and it would be highly receptive to our characterization of the U.S. Congress as a rapacious Zionist body aiming to turn the world into a Jewish fiefdom.

The codename of this operation was “SIG” (Sionistskiye Gosudarstva, or “Zionist Governments”), and was within my Romanian service’s “sphere of influence,” for it embraced Libya, Lebanon, and Syria. SIG was a large party/state operation. We created joint ventures to build hospitals, houses, and roads in these countries, and there we sent thousands of doctors, engineers, technicians, professors, and even dance instructors. All had the task of portraying the United States as an arrogant and haughty Jewish fiefdom financed by Jewish money and run by Jewish politicians, whose aim was to subordinate the entire Islamic world.

In the mid 1970s, the KGB ordered my service, the DIE — along with other East European sister services — to scour the country for trusted party activists belonging to various Islamic ethnic groups, train them in disinformation and terrorist operations, and infiltrate them into the countries of our “sphere of influence.” Their task was to export a rabid, demented hatred for American Zionism by manipulating the ancestral abhorrence for Jews felt by the people in that part of the world. Before I left Romania for good, in 1978, my DIE had dispatched around 500 such undercover agents to Islamic countries. According to a rough estimate received from Moscow, by 1978 the whole Soviet-bloc intelligence community had sent some 4,000 such agents of influence into the Islamic world.

In the mid-1970s we also started showering the Islamic world with an Arabic translation of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a tsarist Russian forgery that had been used by Hitler as the foundation for his anti-Semitic philosophy. We also disseminated a KGB-fabricated “documentary” paper in Arabic alleging that Israel and its main supporter, the United States, were Zionist countries dedicated to converting the Islamic world into a Jewish colony.

We in the Soviet bloc tried to conquer minds, because we knew we could not win any military battles. It is hard to say what exactly are the lasting effects of operation SIG. But the cumulative effect of disseminating hundreds of thousands of Protocols in the Islamic world and portraying Israel and the United States as Islam’s deadly enemies was surely not constructive.

Post-Soviet Russia has been transformed in unprecedented ways, but the widely popular belief that the nefarious Soviet legacy was rooted out at the end of the Cold War the same way that Nazism was rooted out with the conclusion of World War II, is not yet correct.

In the 1950s, when I was chief of Romania’s foreign intelligence station in West Germany, I witnessed how Hitler’s Third Reich had been demolished, its war criminals put on trial, its military and police forces disbanded, and the Nazis removed from public office. None of these things has happened in the former Soviet Union. No individual has been put on trial, although the Soviet Union’s Communist regime killed over a hundred million people. Most Soviet institutions have been left in place, having simply been given new names, and are now run by many of the same people who guided the Communist state. In 2000, former officers of the KGB and the Soviet Red Army took over the Kremlin and Russia’s government.

Germany would have never become a democracy with Gestapo and SS officers running the show.

On September 11, 2001, President Vladimir Putin became the first leader of a foreign country to express sympathy to President George W. Bush for what he called “these terrible tragedies of the terrorist attacks.” Soon, however, Putin began moving his country back into the terrorist business. In March 2002, he quietly reinstituted sales of weapons to Iran’s terrorist dictator, Ayatollah Khamenei, and engaged Russia in the construction of a 1,000-megawatt nuclear reactor at Bushehr, with a uranium conversion facility able to produce fissile material for nuclear weapons. Hundreds of Russian technicians also started helping the government of Iran to develop the Shahab-4 missile, with a range of over 1,250 miles, which can carry a nuclear or germ warhead anywhere in the Middle East and Europe.

Iran’s current president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, had already announced that nothing could stop his country from building nuclear weapons, and he stated that Israel was a “disgraceful stain [on] the Islamic world” that would be eliminated. During World War II, 405,399 Americans died to eradicate Nazism and its anti-Semitic terrorism. Now we are facing Islamic fascism and nuclear anti-Semitic terrorism. The United Nations can offer no hope. It has not yet even been able to define terrorism.

A proverb says that one fire drives out another. The Kremlin may be our best hope. In May 2002, the NATO foreign ministers approved a partnership with Russia, the alliance’s former enemy. The rest of the world said that the Cold War was over and done with. Kaput. Now Russia wants to be admitted to the World Trade Organization. For that to happen, the Kremlin should be firmly told first to get out of the terrorism business.

We should also help the Russians realize that it is in their own interest to make President Ahmadinejad renounce nuclear weapons. He is an unpredictable tyrant who may also consider Russia an enemy at some point in time. “If Iran gets weapons of mass destruction, deliverable by a missile, that’s going to be a problem,” President Bush correctly stated. “That’s going to be a problem for all of us, including Russia.”



—Lt. General Ion Mihai Pacepa is the highest-ranking intelligence officer ever to have defected from the former Soviet bloc. His book Red Horizons has been republished in 27 countries.

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Historic opportunity

SUNDAY, AUGUST 20, 2006
There is a very clear-sighted commentary on the World Peace Herald website written by Arnaud de Borchgrave, UPI Editor at large: The Middle East's silver lining. According to the commentary, this would be a golden opportunity for resolving, or at least for making major headway towards a solution in the Israel-Palestine conflict.

"The current crisis in Lebanon, says Gen. Scowcroft, "provides a historic opportunity to achieve what has seemed impossible." It's now up to the United States, he adds, which alone can mobilize the international community and Israel and the Arab states for the task that has defeated all previous administrations."

Open and fair

SUNDAY, AUGUST 13, 2006
Watch the following and see what it means to be a true Arab:

Israel's reality


Michael Coren, National Post
Published: Thursday, August 03, 2006


Two weeks in Israel in the middle of the war in Lebanon. Stories that should never be forgotten and scenes that I wish could be expunged from my mind. But if one aspect of this entire tragedy pounds away, it is the manner in which the reality of Israel in crisis is so dramatically different from its portrayal in the foreign media. Israelis tend to shrug their shoulders and explain how they are used to the distortion by now. That is sad. Because a lasting peace can only be achieved after a lasting truth.

From the opening days of the latest conflict, the assembled media corps in Israel dwelt on the number and plight of the refugees from Lebanon. Their suffering is generally beyond question and every Israeli I met was devastated by the civilian victims of the war.

But why, they asked, were these same reporters not broadcasting and writing about the hundreds of thousands of Israeli refugees from the north of the country who were fleeing to Tel Aviv and Jerusalem? Around half-a-million Israeli Jews and Arabs have left Haifa, Tiberias and neighbouring towns and thousands more are living each day in underground shelters.

Particularly bitter is the experience of a number of Lebanese who fled their home country six years ago when Hezbollah took over their villages and towns, torturing and raping and killing. They were given residence and often citizenship in Israel and usually live in those areas now being hit so hard by the plague of Katyusha rockets.

Lebanese people fleeing to Syria, on the other hand, receive endless media attention. This is particularly ironic as there are still Lebanese activists in Syrian prisons; and the former prime minister of Lebanon, a man who was helping to transform the nation and was courageously critical of Syrian behaviour, was murdered by a Syrian army of occupation last year.

When it comes to the game of numbers and perception, there is another screaming fallacy in the coverage of the issues. Until just a day or two ago, the foreign media announced every Lebanese fatality as a civilian death. This would mean that the Israeli military is so incompetent and so evil that it had failed to kill a single Hezbollah fighter.

The truth, of course, is that heavily armed Jihadists were being eliminated from the first day of combat. Unlike Israeli soldiers, however, they often wear no uniform and normally have no rank, papers or official status.

In one attack on a bunker in Tyre, more than 30 people were killed by an Israeli aircraft. The official line, weakly replicated by the Western press, was that all of the dead were civilian. It was later revealed that half of them were Hezbollah militia and were found with their weapons.

The question surely is whether we should blame Israel for attacking people who are firing rockets and missiles into their country or blame the people who fire those rockets and missiles and then purposely hide among civilians. If anyone doubts the authenticity of this policy they should spend some time with Lebanese Christians whose homes have been used with special glee by Hezbollah soldiers when firing on Israel.

It is vital to remember one thing about all this. Very few Lebanese people who we see interviewed on television will openly criticize Hezbollah. They know how the organization works and that even if they escape, their families might not be as fortunate. Journalists are regularly questioned about the nature of their story and the line they are taking and often intimidated and threatened.

Pressure is one thing, sheer failure to report the truth quite another. After the Israeli Arab town of Nazareth was shelled and two young boys killed, some journalists ran with the news that because this was an Arab town the Israeli government had removed it from the siren alert system. We saw footage of locals condemning Israeli discrimination and apathy.

It is true that there were no alarms sounded and that Nazareth had been removed from the national alarm grid -- because officials in Nazareth had demanded it. Being part of this system means that the sirens operate for two minutes during Independence Day and Memorial Day, to the memory of fallen soldiers. The political leaders of Nazareth insisted that they wanted no part of these Zionist ceremonies and, when warned that removal might be dangerous, laughingly said in a television interview that their brothers in Lebanon would never attack them.

Another Israeli shrug. The same again when the foreign media refuses to say that Haifa, the hardest hit of the cities in Israel, has a university that is almost 40% Arab and that in every survey that has asked them if they would prefer any Arab citizenship to Israeli citizenship, the overwhelming majority laugh, or cry, at the very idea of Arab citizenship.













Then there are the apparently unacceptable questions. Why, for example, do we see so many pictures of horribly wounded and even dying Arabs but so few of Israelis who have been smashed apart by rockets filled with ball bearings? The answer is that Israeli officials shield the wounded and vulnerable and protect them from indignity. Hezbollah and Hamas operatives, on the other hand, positively welcome often appallingly intimate shots of their wounded.

Politically unacceptable to say but still nauseatingly true. As is the fact that behind the rocket batteries in the Tyre banana plantations are civilians and that beside the Hezbollah killing machines in Beirut are innocent people. Israel pleads with the harmless to flee but still they sometimes die. Only the biased and the naive would blame Israel rather than Iran, Syria and Hezbollah for this.

Tragically, there are many of both among those who claim to be explaining the story. And another Israeli shrugs.

- Michael Coren is a writer and broadcaster. http://www.michaelcoren.com

The media war against the Jews

FRIDAY, AUGUST 04, 2006
As a person with German ancestry I do feel the obligation to point out an alarming trend, which reminds us of days gone and seemingly forgotten. Let us not repeat the sins of our fathers!!!

Please, read and ponder the following:
The media war against the Jews
The media aims its missiles
European Media and Anti-Israel Bias
Qana in context
The Chicago Tribune as a Provocateur
What Media Bias?
Why Is the Press So Anti-Israel?
Israel and Bias in the American Press

Hezbollah and civilians

THURSDAY, AUGUST 03, 2006

I have seen several times now Ms Carla Jazzar, First Secretary at the Lebanese Embassy in Wasgington, speak on TV, saying that the fact that Hezbollah fighters shoot their rockets from civilian areas is all a pack of lies. Could someone, please, forward to her this photo here, plus he following material: article with photos in the Australian Herald Sun, video on YouTube, the article Christians Fleeing Lebanon Denounce Hezbollah (with photos) in The New York Times, July 28, 2006 (registration is necessary to view any archived material),

It is a different issue whether it is all right for the Israelis to "make mistakes", like the Qana air strike, which was since revised to 28 dead. We DO have visible proof that they are at least trying to hit only legitimate military targets. Hezbollah on the other hand send their rockets off towards civilian areas, packed with pellets and nails, with the specific goal toharm human targets. The only reason they produce less victims is that the rockets have to travel relatively long distances and the early warning system in Israel makes it possible for people to run for cover. Had the Israeli offensive not push Hezbollah back farther, the damage would have been way bigger.

But all these are just details. The more burning issue is that Hezbollah exists in the first place, and that in its present form now is a well trained, properly brainwashed proxy army of Iran's Islamic regime, which uses it for its own purposes in trying to increase its regional dominance. Until the Shia Lebanese recongnize this themselves and realize that they are double victims, that they themselves had no valid reasons for the massive arms build-up and the actual picking of fights with their southern neighbours, there is no hope...

Islam and democracy

THURSDAY, AUGUST 03, 2006
I was talking to a friend yesterday, discussing the prospects of a peaceful, democratic Middle East. His opinion was expressed with this concise proverb: "We can lead a horse to water, but we cannot make it drink..." The picture that forms in my mind, also, after years of watching how things unfold, is more and more that of people who simply do not want true democracy. I know, I know, some of my Muslim friends argue vehemently that they do want democracy but "not a Western style one". OK, I am ready to listen and hear the principles of a specific Middle Eastern style democracy. I have yet to hear any convincing ones.

The three shura principles should promote equality and justice, right? But I question whether that coincides with the secular concepts. Religious laws, specially those that are based on the Qur'an, have precedence over true observance of individual freedom, "mas'uliyah jama'iyyah", that is, collective responsibility, comes first. Unfortunately collective views are more often than not guided (imposed) by religious authority. Often those views may seem correct in the religious context, yet they can be very limiting, infringing on individual freedom. "Khilafah, which means God's delegation of authority to the ummah - (means that) every individual member of the ummah is legally obligated to ensure the proper execution of the delegated authority".* Who decides what is "proper"? Each individual? Or there are religious guidelines (ijma), ultimately interpreted and upheld by the clergy? To me that does not sound very promising.

In my opinion true democracy cannot be attained based on religious principles, be that Muslim, Christian or any other belief system, simply because it necessitates interpretation of scriptural edicts that are often fuzzy, open to opposing ways of understanding them. Exactly these opposing views can get in the way when it comes to peaceful coexistence. These opposing views are the basis of the Sunni-Shia conflict in Iraq. Don't misunderstand me, I am aware that the situation there is much more complex than just the religious sectarianism. But it doesn't change the fact that the sectarian differences enabled the original historic separation, allowing the development of the present conflict.

The power of pictures and media

SUNDAY, JULY 30, 2006
Yes, pictures and media reporting can be very powerful. And it can be very revealing, even when the reporters themselves are not aware of what they are revealing.

When I opened the TV today and heard about the Qana tragedy, I felt horror stricken. It sounded like there was a deliberate direct hit on a building that housed those refugees. Then I started to dig for details. I found out that it is not THAT building that got hit but another one next to it, which "happened" to be used by Hezbollah rocket launchers. The deaths are the result of the concrete roof of the shelter collapsing. Hmmm... Do you think, maybe, just maybe, those Hezbollah fighters were not aware that there were people in the shelter next door...? I heard that Israel is going to release the video showing exactly how it happened, where the Hezbollah rockets were launched from. Until then here is an older video, taken on July 26, showing a similar situation. There the next door building luckily stayed intact.

Now the world is outraged at Israel for commiting such a heinous crime. Can we realistically expect from Israel to have known that there were civilians in the basement next door? Or that this next door building would not withstand the blast? Supposing they knew it, could you realistically expect Israel not to target that rocket launcher BECAUSE its proximity to those civilians? They did so in the past, and the Hezbollah operators obviously counted on it. For them either way is good:
a) if Israel does not shoot, they saved themselves.
b) if Israel does shoot, they die a martyr's death and the civilian casualties will work in Hezbollah's favour in the international arena.

This takes me to my main point. I just saw the "reaction" of a mob of 5000 in Beirut attacking the UN headquarters, "in protest" to what happened. Of course it was really impressively violent, very subconsciously scary for the average viewer. One could not stop wondering: if this kind of violence could potentially get unleashed in London, Paris, New York, in our backyards, maybe we SHOULD stop the Israelis before Arab emotions really get out of hand. Well, my reaction was slightly different, a reaction that may have been somewhat similar to some of the UN personel inside that building: "Oh, God! Couldn't we just carpet bomb this crowd...?"

And here I am, struggling with these emotions. Because at the same time I am aware of the fact that these Southern Muslim Lebanese are actually hostages. Hezbollah may have been a grassroot force, truly Lebanese, at birth. Although I do question even that because of their famous attack on the American peacekeepers in 1982. But Hezbollah definitely lost all its raison d'etre after Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon. That is why I questioned in an earlier post that how come there was a lack of similar military reaction to the Syrian presence, even though they stayed way longer in Lebanon, interfering left, right and centre.

By now it should be clearly visible to all that the whole of Southern Lebanon are used as miserable puppets by some other forces who want to use them as the actual front in the fight against Israel. If they were purely of Lebanese interest, what do they have against Israel right now? The Shebaa Farms? I mean, come on...!!! Does that (Syrian!) little piece of land warrant all the military build-up, with 10 000 rockets pointing at Israel and thousands off well trained and armed troops ready for ground combat? Or would "brotherly feelings" towards the Palestinians, against whom they actually faught in the past, warrant for jeopardising their own lives and the lives of their families by fighting for and instead of them? I am sure this propaganda slogan makes the Palestinians feel all warm and fuzzy inside, except that it is not exactly true. I found a very good analysis here yesterday that makes a lot of sense. I wonder if all of it is true. It does make a lot of the puzzle pieces fall into place, but I will have to look into all the details to make up my mind. Because if it is true, it is very, VERY SCARY!!!

-----------

I just watched our beloved CBC showing the anti-Israel demonstration in Montreal. All those empassioned cries for the "innocent lives lost". Yes, true! But how come everybody so quickly forgot the images of the leaflets the Israelis have distributed all over the would-be front line, warning all the civilians to leave? The images of men and women spitefully tearing them up for the benefit of the cameras? And did these Canadian viewers now react in a knee-jerk way to the interviewed villagers saying to the journalists that "those people were too poor to afford the fees they needed to flee", taking it at face value? I would not be surprised to find that some of those interviewees were the very same people who gave rich(er) villagers a ride - "for an appropriate fee", of course. My God, 60 or so people...! Looking down in the military videos on those trucks that carried the rocketlaunchers, I realised that just two of those would have been sufficient to cart everybody away to safety, and still have time to return for the good fight they were wishing for. If Hezbollah was such a socially generous and responsible entity over the decades, how come they couldn't provide this service for the safety of the villagers - FOR FREE? And if any of those grieved villagers interviewed on CNN were actual Hezbollah fighters, would you have been able to tell...?

But Hezbollah thought it was better for those people to stay. Hezbollah thought it was all right to launch rockets right next door from them. Yet so many people all over the world don't seem to think about these things. Where is the anger against Hezbollah? Or Syria and Iran, who are behind Hezbollah? Why only against Israel or the United Nations? How is it that I see all this and so many people don't? When, tell me when, at what point in history, will people realize the extant at which those poor South Lebanese were intellectually hijacked and used?

Lebanon

TUESDAY, JULY 25, 2006
Here we go...! Politics! With a capital P.
I am not a particularly political person but today I heard a caller on the radio commenting on the present Israel-Hezbollah war, and I heard the unsatisfactory answer of the talkshow host - which then triggered a train of thoughts as to how would I have liked that call-in to be answered. This is what I would have liked to unfold on that radio show.

The caller was an obvious Hezbollah sympathyzer and he defended Hezbollah after a previous caller said that Hezbollah was a terrorist organization. The caller emphasized that Hezbollah was a guerilla organization the mandate of which was to fight the Israeli occupation in Lebanon. The host replied that he considers Hezbollah terrorist organization because it wants the distruction of all of Israel. To which every pro-Hezbollah' listener surely just nods their head, "Dah...! But of course! After all isn't Israel the great aggressor, the great Satan?"

Now I would have liked the following reply:If Hezbollah was created to push out all the Israelis from Lebanon, how come it is still there six years after Israel left? How come there were over 10 000 rockets amassed at Israel's northern border, ready to strike at any time? Does the caller know where the financial and military support came from which built up that sizeable military infrastructure?

Also think about the fact, that Israel was not the only occupier force in Lebanon. While all those years that Israel maintained only a buffer zone along its borders, Syria was in there, too, - all the way in! As a matter of fact they left barely a year ago, after much international pressure. How come there was no anti-Syrian resistance guerilla army, fighting the Syrians? We all know that the Syrians weren't white lilies, either, when it comes to aggression and killings. Do you think Syria would have exercised utmost restraint if there was a Western backed guerilla army along its Lebanese borders, with tens of thousands of rockets pointing in their direction, an army whose expressed mandate would be to wipe Syria off the face of the Earth? Should this army have killed eight Syrian soldiers and kidnapped two, on Syrian soil(!), do you think they would not have responded? And do you think they would not have used the opportunity to try and destroy that growing and threatening military entity along their borders - the rest of Lebanon be damned...?

The caller also tried to defend Hezbollah as being more than just an army, but a social umbrella that brought great amount of help to the people in the south of Lebanon. Sure...! Sounds to me very much like the modus operandi of the Christian missionaries over the ages. Help, with strings attached. Come, come, we provide you with financial aid, medical service, schools, etc. All we want from you is to commit yourself to Shiite principles, live a clean life, and develop an exalted spirit that will help you join us in the fight of our great enemy, the "Zionist pigs"! They definitely were committed to raise the youth of South Lebanon on these ideas in their schools. All these may sound wonderful for the insider, but for the outsider it very much looks like whoever financed all these had the goal to buy the souls of the Southern Lebanese people with some proverbial loaves of bread. Why? So that when they fight Israel it should look like it is only a small Lebanese guerilla group fighting the big bad wolf of Zionist Israel. Yet, by their own (very recent!) admission they are actually fighting the fight of all of the Muslim world. See and hear it for yourself, from the mouth of Nasrallah, as he spoke on Al Manar TV on July 16 ( click on #1194). Knowing this, doesn't that make you wonder: to what extent those poor Southern Lebanese have been duped? Don't you feel sorry for them?